Creative Coaching Practices to Enhance Athletic Performance

References

1. Barker-Ruchti, N, and Tinning, R. Foucault in leotards: Corporeal discipline in women’s artistic gymnastics. Sociology of Sport Journal 27: 229-250, 2010.

2. Bartlett, R, Wheat, J, and Robins, M. Is movement variability important for sports biomechanists? Sports Biomechanics 6(2): 224-243, 2007.

3. Bosch, F. Strength training and coordination: An integrative approach. Rotterdam, Netherlands: 2010 Uitgevers; 2015.

4. Denison, J. Planning, practice and performance: The discursive formation of coaches’ knowledge. Sport, Education and Society 15: 461-478, 2010.

5. Denison, J. Social theory for coaches: A Foucauldian reading of one athlete’s poor performance. International Journal of Sports Science and Coaching 2: 369-383, 2007.

6. Foucault, M. The Archaeology of Knowledge. New York, NY: Vintage; 1972.

7. Foucault, M. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York, NY: Random House; 1977.

8. Gearity, BT, and Mills, JP. Discipline and punish in the weight room. Sports Coaching Review 1(2): 124-134, 2013.

9. Hammill, J, Palmer, C, and Emmerik, R. Coordinative variability and overuse injury. Sports Medicine, Arthroscopy, Rehabilitation, Therapy and Technology 4(45): 1-9, 2012.

10. Johns, DP, and Johns, JS. Surveillence, subjectivism and technologies of power: An analysis of the discursive practice of high-performance sport. International Review for the Sociology of Sport 35(2): 219-234, 2000.

11. Kuklick, C, and Gearity, B. A Foucauldian Intervention Implemented for Strength and Conditioning Coaches. North American Society for the Sociology of Sport Conference, 2016.

12. Kuklick, C, and Gearity, B. Is athlete “buy-in” all that it is cracked up to be? An analysis of strength and condition coach talk discourse. NSCA Coach 5(1): 32-36, 2018.

13. Kuklick, C, and Gearity, B. New movement practices: A Foucauldian learning community to disrupt technologies of discipline. Sociology of Sport Journal: under review (in press).

14. Kuklick, C, and Gearity, B. Unintended consequences of too much discipline. An analysis of strength and condition coach talk discourse. NSCA Coach 5(3): 36-39, 2018.

15. Mann, JB, Thyfault, JP, and Ivey, PA. The effect of autoregulatory progressive resistance exercise vs. linear periodization on strength improvement in college athletes. The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 24(7): 1718-1723, 2010.

16. Markula, P, and Pringle, R. Knowledge and truth: Discursive Construction of the fit and healthy body. In: Markula, P, and Pringle, T. (Eds.), Foucault, Sport, and Exercise: Power, Knowledge and Transforming the Self. New York, NY: Routledge; 2006.

17. Morris, CW. The effect of fluid periodization on athletic performance outcomes in American football players (Doctoral dissertation, University of Kentucky). Theses and Dissertations— Kinesiology and Health Promotion: 24, 2015. Retrieved from https://uknowledge.uky.edu/khp_etds/24.

18. Naimo, M, Zourdos, M, Wilson, J, Kim, J, Ward, E, Eccles, D, and Panton, L. Contextual interference effects on the acquisition of skill and strength of the bench press. Human Movement Science 3(32): 472-484, 2013.

19. Rhea, MR, Ball, SD, Phillips, WT, and Burkett, LN. A comparison of linear and daily undulating periodized programs with equated volume and intensity for strength. The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 16(2): 250-255, 2002.

20. Schmidt, R, and Lee, T. Motor Learning and Performance: From Principles to Application (5th ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2014.

21. Shea, C, Kohl, R, and Indermill, C. Contextual interference: Contributions of practice. Acta Psychologica 73(2): 145-157, 1990.

22. Sheppard, J, and Triplett, T. Program Design for Resistance Training. In: Haff, G, and Triplett, T. (Eds.), Essentials of Strength and Conditioning. (4th ed.) Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 439-469, 2016.